Azərbaycanca
Deutsch
English
Français
Русский
ภาษาไทย
Українська
Black Garden: Armenia and Azerbaijan Through Peace and War is a 2003 book by Thomas de Waal, based on a study of Armenia and Azerbaijan, two former Soviet republics, during the First Nagorno-Karabakh War. It consists of a history of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict since 1988 combined with interviews conducted on the ground in the aftermath of the war.
 First edition | |
| Author | Thomas de Waal |
|---|---|
| Language | English |
| Subject | First Nagorno-Karabakh War |
| Publisher | NYU Press |
Publication date | 2003 |
| Publication place | United Kingdom |
| Media type | |
| Pages | 360 pages |
| ISBN | 0-8147-6032-5 |
The book won the Outstanding Academic Title 2003 award from Choice Reviews.
Reviews
Neal Ascherson in The New York Review of Books described Black Garden as "admirable and rigorous" and Amer Latif in Parameters called it "a lucid, evenhanded analysis of the intricacies of this conflict". Time magazine reviewer Paul Quinn-Judge and Robert Chenciner in International Affairs also gave the book positive reviews.
The book was particularly praised for its balanced approach given the ethno-nationalist nature of the conflict. In African and Asian Studies, Samuel Andoh wrote that "most articles on the conflict tend to partial towards one side or the other, putting the blame on Armenia or Azerbaijan ... Black Garden ... is probably one of the few exceptions."
Writing in Foreign Affairs, Robert Legvold praised de Waal for providing "a deeper and more compelling account of the conflict than anyone before ... one likely to exercise give-no-quarters partisans on both sides."
Writing in Nationalities Papers, Ruzan Hakobyan praises the book for being "one of the best and most comprehensive works not only on the Karabagh conflict but also on the region as a whole". However, in the same review she also explains that "an informed eye can detect certain drawbacks". Hakobyan lists two drawbacks, the first one being, according to her, the repeated assertion that the start of the conflict was unexpected for both Armenians and Azeris of Karabakh who lived peacefully and in good relations side-by-side, labeling this as "at the very least optimistic" . Within the context of providing an example, Hakobyan states: "For 70 years Armenians in Karabagh have been systematically subjected to a deliberate policy of discrimination and removal from their homeland and have made repeated attempts to rectify the situation". She then proceeds to list the gradual decrease and increase of the Karabakhi Armenia and Azerbaijani population, respectively, during Soviet rule by using Soviet censuses. Another drawback mentioned by Hakobyan: "one cannot help detecting is that in trying to be impartial the author sometimes slips into flatly equalizing the behaviours of the Armenians and the Azeris during the years of the conflict, thus undermining the historical reality. For instance, he [de Waal] repeatedly claims that the Azeri population that left Armenia in the first year of the conflict has undergone the same inhuman treatment from Armenians as the Armenian population in Sumgait and Baku. But he has no data on which to base this assertion. All he manages to produce are the unfounded assertions of the Azeri population itself, while the atrocities that Azeris had performed towards the Armenian population in Sumgait and Baku are thoroughly documented and widely known". She concludes the review by mentioning that Black Garden, even with such drawbacks, remains of high quality and significance.
Criticism
A number of Armenian academics and analysts were critical of the book, arguing that it presents a false balance between Armenia and Azerbaijan and contains inaccuracies. Professor Alexander Manasyan of Yerevan State University, in reviewing Black Garden, wrote that de Waal "supports the point of view which is steered by the propaganda machine of Baku" and "carries out [the] Azerbaijani position by distorting the essence of the problem, masterfully going around all the unfavorable to Azerbaijani position facts and events [sic], skillfully offering lie as believable truth".
The book was also criticized by Karen Vrtanesyan, an Armenian expert for the Ararat Center for Strategic Research, as "a banal propaganda but not an objective research on [the] Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict." Vrtanesyan concludes that "Black Garden is not an unbiased work, neither can its author be considered a neutral observer."
Tatul Hakobyan, an independent Armenian analyst and journalist, wrote that de Waal had quoted Serzh Sargsyan out of context in the Black Garden regarding the latter's comments about the Khojaly Massacre.
References
- "Thomas de Waal". belgradeforum.org. Belgrade Security Forum. Archived from the original on 7 July 2013. Retrieved 7 July 2013.
- "Thomas de Waal presents supplemented version of his "Black Garden" book in Yerevan". mediamax.am. Retrieved 7 July 2013.
- "Awards & Grants: Black garden: Armenia and Azerbaijan through peace and war". Choice Reviews. American Library Association. Retrieved 16 May 2021.
- Ascherson, Neal (20 November 2003). "In the Black Garden". The New York Review. Retrieved 17 May 2021.
- Dr. Latif, Amer (2005). "Book Reviews". Parameters. 35 (1): 141–143. Retrieved 17 May 2021.
- Quinn-Judge, Paul (2 February 2004). "Two Peoples, One Nightmare". Time. Retrieved 17 May 2021.
- Chenciner, Robert (2011). "Review". International Affairs. 87 (3): 742. ISSN 0020-5850. JSTOR 20869740.
[de Waal's] magisterial histories are an essential part of a comprehensible explanation of the intractable problems that beset the region.
- Andoh, Samuel K. (9 May 2014). "Book review: Armenia and Azerbaijan through Peace and War: Black Garden: 10 Year Anniversary Edition, written by Thomas de Waal". African and Asian Studies. 13 (1–2). Brill: 241–244. doi:10.1163/15692108-12341295.
- Legvold, Robert (November 2003). "Black Garden: Armenia and Azerbaijan Through Peace and War". Foreign Affairs. Retrieved 17 May 2021.
- Hakobyan, R. (2004). "Thomas de Waal, (New York and London: New York University Press, 2003), Black Garden: Armenia and Azerbaijan through Peace and War, 337 pp. maps, illustrations". Nationalities Papers. 32 (3): 699–701. doi:10.1017/S0090599200016317. S2CID 186477839.
- Manasyan, Alexander (19 February 2007). "Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict: on the Frontlines of the Information War, or the Last "Accord" of the Year". International Center for Human Development. Retrieved 30 September 2007.
- "Studies on Strategy and Security", compiled and edited, with an introduction and commentary by Dr Armen Ayvazyan, Yerevan, Lusakn, 2007, 684 pp. , p. 657
- Vrtanesyan, Karen. ""The Black Garden": In Search of Imagined Balance". Ararat Center for Strategic Research. Retrieved 29 September 2007..
- Hakobyan, Tatul (26 February 2018). "Խոջալուի մասին Սերժ Սարգսյանի խոսքերը Թոմաս դե Վաալը ենթատեքստից դուրս է մեջբերել". ANI Armenian Research Center (in Armenian).
 | This article about a book on international relations is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
Author: www.NiNa.Az
Publication date:
wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library, article, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games, mobile, phone, android, ios, apple, mobile phone, samsung, iphone, xiomi, xiaomi, redmi, honor, oppo, nokia, sonya, mi, pc, web, computer
Black Garden Armenia and Azerbaijan Through Peace and War is a 2003 book by Thomas de Waal based on a study of Armenia and Azerbaijan two former Soviet republics during the First Nagorno Karabakh War It consists of a history of the Nagorno Karabakh conflict since 1988 combined with interviews conducted on the ground in the aftermath of the war Black Garden Armenia and Azerbaijan Through Peace and WarFirst editionAuthorThomas de WaalLanguageEnglishSubjectFirst Nagorno Karabakh WarPublisherNYU PressPublication date2003Publication placeUnited KingdomMedia typePrintPages360 pagesISBN0 8147 6032 5 The book won the Outstanding Academic Title 2003 award from Choice Reviews ReviewsNeal Ascherson in The New York Review of Books described Black Garden as admirable and rigorous and Amer Latif in Parameters called it a lucid evenhanded analysis of the intricacies of this conflict Time magazine reviewer Paul Quinn Judge and Robert Chenciner in International Affairs also gave the book positive reviews The book was particularly praised for its balanced approach given the ethno nationalist nature of the conflict In African and Asian Studies Samuel Andoh wrote that most articles on the conflict tend to partial towards one side or the other putting the blame on Armenia or Azerbaijan Black Garden is probably one of the few exceptions Writing in Foreign Affairs Robert Legvold praised de Waal for providing a deeper and more compelling account of the conflict than anyone before one likely to exercise give no quarters partisans on both sides Writing in Nationalities Papers Ruzan Hakobyan praises the book for being one of the best and most comprehensive works not only on the Karabagh conflict but also on the region as a whole However in the same review she also explains that an informed eye can detect certain drawbacks Hakobyan lists two drawbacks the first one being according to her the repeated assertion that the start of the conflict was unexpected for both Armenians and Azeris of Karabakh who lived peacefully and in good relations side by side labeling this as at the very least optimistic Within the context of providing an example Hakobyan states For 70 years Armenians in Karabagh have been systematically subjected to a deliberate policy of discrimination and removal from their homeland and have made repeated attempts to rectify the situation She then proceeds to list the gradual decrease and increase of the Karabakhi Armenia and Azerbaijani population respectively during Soviet rule by using Soviet censuses Another drawback mentioned by Hakobyan one cannot help detecting is that in trying to be impartial the author sometimes slips into flatly equalizing the behaviours of the Armenians and the Azeris during the years of the conflict thus undermining the historical reality For instance he de Waal repeatedly claims that the Azeri population that left Armenia in the first year of the conflict has undergone the same inhuman treatment from Armenians as the Armenian population in Sumgait and Baku But he has no data on which to base this assertion All he manages to produce are the unfounded assertions of the Azeri population itself while the atrocities that Azeris had performed towards the Armenian population in Sumgait and Baku are thoroughly documented and widely known She concludes the review by mentioning that Black Garden even with such drawbacks remains of high quality and significance CriticismA number of Armenian academics and analysts were critical of the book arguing that it presents a false balance between Armenia and Azerbaijan and contains inaccuracies Professor Alexander Manasyan of Yerevan State University in reviewing Black Garden wrote that de Waal supports the point of view which is steered by the propaganda machine of Baku and carries out the Azerbaijani position by distorting the essence of the problem masterfully going around all the unfavorable to Azerbaijani position facts and events sic skillfully offering lie as believable truth The book was also criticized by Karen Vrtanesyan an Armenian expert for the Ararat Center for Strategic Research as a banal propaganda but not an objective research on the Armenian Azerbaijani conflict Vrtanesyan concludes that Black Garden is not an unbiased work neither can its author be considered a neutral observer Tatul Hakobyan an independent Armenian analyst and journalist wrote that de Waal had quoted Serzh Sargsyan out of context in the Black Garden regarding the latter s comments about the Khojaly Massacre References Thomas de Waal belgradeforum org Belgrade Security Forum Archived from the original on 7 July 2013 Retrieved 7 July 2013 Thomas de Waal presents supplemented version of his Black Garden book in Yerevan mediamax am Retrieved 7 July 2013 Awards amp Grants Black garden Armenia and Azerbaijan through peace and war Choice Reviews American Library Association Retrieved 16 May 2021 Ascherson Neal 20 November 2003 In the Black Garden The New York Review Retrieved 17 May 2021 Dr Latif Amer 2005 Book Reviews Parameters 35 1 141 143 Retrieved 17 May 2021 Quinn Judge Paul 2 February 2004 Two Peoples One Nightmare Time Retrieved 17 May 2021 Chenciner Robert 2011 Review International Affairs 87 3 742 ISSN 0020 5850 JSTOR 20869740 de Waal s magisterial histories are an essential part of a comprehensible explanation of the intractable problems that beset the region Andoh Samuel K 9 May 2014 Book review Armenia and Azerbaijan through Peace and War Black Garden 10 Year Anniversary Edition written by Thomas de Waal African and Asian Studies 13 1 2 Brill 241 244 doi 10 1163 15692108 12341295 Legvold Robert November 2003 Black Garden Armenia and Azerbaijan Through Peace and War Foreign Affairs Retrieved 17 May 2021 Hakobyan R 2004 Thomas de Waal New York and London New York University Press 2003 Black Garden Armenia and Azerbaijan through Peace and War 337 pp maps illustrations Nationalities Papers 32 3 699 701 doi 10 1017 S0090599200016317 S2CID 186477839 Manasyan Alexander 19 February 2007 Nagorno Karabakh Conflict on the Frontlines of the Information War or the Last Accord of the Year International Center for Human Development Retrieved 30 September 2007 Studies on Strategy and Security compiled and edited with an introduction and commentary by Dr Armen Ayvazyan Yerevan Lusakn 2007 684 pp p 657 Vrtanesyan Karen The Black Garden In Search of Imagined Balance Ararat Center for Strategic Research Retrieved 29 September 2007 Hakobyan Tatul 26 February 2018 Խոջալուի մասին Սերժ Սարգսյանի խոսքերը Թոմաս դե Վաալը ենթատեքստից դուրս է մեջբերել ANI Armenian Research Center in Armenian This article about a book on international relations is a stub You can help Wikipedia by expanding it vte