Azərbaycanca
Deutsch
English
Français
Русский
ภาษาไทย
Türkçe
Українська
This is a list of cases reported in volume 256 of United States Reports, decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1921.
| Supreme Court of the United States | |
|---|---|
 | |
 | |
| 38°53′26″N 77°00′16″W / 38.89056°N 77.00444°W | |
| Established | March 4, 1789 |
| Location | Washington, D.C. |
| Coordinates | 38°53′26″N 77°00′16″W / 38.89056°N 77.00444°W |
| Composition method | Presidential nomination with Senate confirmation |
| Authorised by | Constitution of the United States, Art. III, § 1 |
| Judge term length | life tenure, subject to impeachment and removal |
| Number of positions | 9 (by statute) |
| Website | supremecourt |
Justices of the Supreme Court at the time of volume 256 U.S.
The Supreme Court is established by Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution of the United States, which says: "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court . . .". The size of the Court is not specified; the Constitution leaves it to Congress to set the number of justices. Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 Congress originally fixed the number of justices at six (one chief justice and five associate justices). Since 1789 Congress has varied the size of the Court from six to seven, nine, ten, and back to nine justices (always including one chief justice).
When the cases in volume 256 were decided the Court comprised the following nine members:
| Portrait | Justice | Office | Home State | Succeeded | Date confirmed by the Senate (Vote) | Tenure on Supreme Court |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 | Edward Douglass White | Chief Justice | Louisiana | Melville Fuller | December 12, 1910 (Acclamation) | December 19, 1910 – May 19, 1921 (Died) |
 | Joseph McKenna | Associate Justice | California | Stephen Johnson Field | January 21, 1898 (Acclamation) | January 26, 1898 – January 5, 1925 (Retired) |
 | Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. | Associate Justice | Massachusetts | Horace Gray | December 4, 1902 (Acclamation) | December 8, 1902 – January 12, 1932 (Retired) |
 | William R. Day | Associate Justice | Ohio | George Shiras Jr. | February 23, 1903 (Acclamation) | March 2, 1903 – November 13, 1922 (Retired) |
 | Willis Van Devanter | Associate Justice | Wyoming | Edward Douglass White (as Associate Justice) | December 15, 1910 (Acclamation) | January 3, 1911 – June 2, 1937 (Retired) |
 | Mahlon Pitney | Associate Justice | New Jersey | John Marshall Harlan | March 13, 1912 (50–26) | March 18, 1912 – December 31, 1922 (Resigned) |
 | James Clark McReynolds | Associate Justice | Tennessee | Horace Harmon Lurton | August 29, 1914 (44–6) | October 12, 1914 – January 31, 1941 (Retired) |
 | Louis Brandeis | Associate Justice | Massachusetts | Joseph Rucker Lamar | June 1, 1916 (47–22) | June 5, 1916 – February 13, 1939 (Retired) |
 | John Hessin Clarke | Associate Justice | Ohio | Charles Evans Hughes | July 24, 1916 (Acclamation) | October 9, 1916 – September 18, 1922 (Retired) |
Notable Cases in volume 256 U.S.
Block v. Hirsh
In Block v. Hirsh, 256 U.S. 135 (1921), the Supreme Court upheld a temporary rent control law in the District of Columbia. It set a precedent in American law that government can regulate housing conditions during times of emergency to maintain or improve living conditions. In 1924, however, the rental property statute upheld in the case reached the Court for a second review. This time, despite the language being the same, the statute was struck down. The Court held that the emergency necessitating the measure had passed, and that that which "justified interference with ordinarily existing property rights as of 1919 had come to an end by 1922."
Newberry v. United States
Newberry v. United States, 256 U.S. 232 (1921), is a decision by the Supreme Court which held that the United States Constitution did not grant the United States Congress the authority to regulate political party primaries or nomination processes. The Court struck down 1911 amendments to the Federal Corrupt Practices Act which placed spending limits on candidate and political election committee spending in primaries or other nomination processes for federal office.
Brown v. United States
In Brown v. United States, 256 U.S. 335 (1921), the Supreme Court held that if a person is attacked, and that person reasonably believes that they are in immediate danger of death or grievous bodily injury, then they have no duty to retreat and may stand their ground; if they kill the attacker they have not exceeded the bounds of lawful self-defense. In writing the opinion, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes stated “Detached reflection cannot be demanded in the presence of an uplifted knife. Therefore, in this Court, at least, it is not a condition of immunity that one in that situation should pause to consider whether a reasonable man might not think it possible to fly with safety or to disable his assailant rather than to kill him.”
Dillon v. Gloss
Dillon v. Gloss, 256 U.S. 368 (1921), is a case in which the Supreme Court held that Congress, when proposing a constitutional amendment under the authority given to it by Article V of the Constitution, may fix a definite period for its ratification, and further, that the reasonableness of the seven-year period, fixed by Congress in the resolution proposing the Eighteenth Amendment is beyond question.
Citation style
Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 the federal court structure at the time comprised District Courts, which had general trial jurisdiction; Circuit Courts, which had mixed trial and appellate (from the US District Courts) jurisdiction; and the United States Supreme Court, which had appellate jurisdiction over the federal District and Circuit courts—and for certain issues over state courts. The Supreme Court also had limited original jurisdiction (i.e., in which cases could be filed directly with the Supreme Court without first having been heard by a lower federal or state court). There were one or more federal District Courts and/or Circuit Courts in each state, territory, or other geographical region.
The Judiciary Act of 1891 created the United States Courts of Appeals and reassigned the jurisdiction of most routine appeals from the district and circuit courts to these appellate courts. The Act created nine new courts that were originally known as the "United States Circuit Courts of Appeals." The new courts had jurisdiction over most appeals of lower court decisions. The Supreme Court could review either legal issues that a court of appeals certified or decisions of court of appeals by writ of certiorari. On January 1, 1912, the effective date of the Judicial Code of 1911, the old Circuit Courts were abolished, with their remaining trial court jurisdiction transferred to the U.S. District Courts.
Bluebook citation style is used for case names, citations, and jurisdictions.
- "# Cir." = United States Court of Appeals
- e.g., "3d Cir." = United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
- "D." = United States District Court for the District of . . .
- e.g.,"D. Mass." = United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts
- "E." = Eastern; "M." = Middle; "N." = Northern; "S." = Southern; "W." = Western
- e.g.,"M.D. Ala." = United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
- "Ct. Cl." = United States Court of Claims
- The abbreviation of a state's name alone indicates the highest appellate court in that state's judiciary at the time.
- e.g.,"Pa." = Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
- e.g.,"Me." = Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
List of cases in volume 256 U.S.
| Case Name | Page and year | Opinion of the Court | Concurring opinion(s) | Dissenting opinion(s) | Lower Court | Disposition |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 (1921) | McKenna | none | none | 8th Cir. | affirmed | |
| 10 (1921) | McKenna | none | none | 8th Cir. | affirmed | |
| United States v. Smith | 11 (1921) | McKenna | none | none | Ct. Cl. | affirmed |
| 18 (1921) | Holmes | none | none | 8th Cir. | reversed | |
| Arkansas v. Mississippi | 28 (1921) | per curiam | none | none | original | boundary set |
| 35 (1921) | Day | none | none | D.C. Cir. | dismissed | |
| 40 (1921) | Day | none | none | D.C. Cir. | dismissed | |
| Minnesota ex rel. Whipple v. Martinson | 41 (1921) | Day | none | none | Minn. | affirmed |
| 46 (1921) | Day | none | none | 8th Cir. | reversed | |
| United States v. Northern Pacific Railroad Company | 51 (1921) | VanDevanter | none | none | 9th Cir. | reversed |
| Oklahoma v. Texas | 70 (1921) | Pitney | none | none | original | boundary set |
| 94 (1921) | Pitney | none | White | Del. | affirmed | |
| 113 (1921) | Pitney | none | none | 7th Cir. | affirmed | |
| Wall v. Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company | 125 (1921) | McReynolds | none | none | Ill. | dismissed |
| Bank of Minden v. Clement | 126 (1921) | McReynolds | none | none | La. | reversed |
| 129 (1921) | McReynolds | none | none | Cal. | dismissed | |
| Ex parte National Park Bank of New York | 131 (1921) | Brandeis | none | none | 5th Cir. | mandamus denied |
| Missouri Pacific Railroad Company v. McGrew Coal Company | 134 (1921) | Brandeis | none | none | Mo. | affirmed |
| Block v. Hirsh | 135 (1921) | Holmes | none | McKenna | D.C. Cir. | reversed |
| 170 (1921) | Holmes | none | McKenna | S.D.N.Y. | affirmed | |
| 201 (1921) | VanDevanter | none | none | 8th Cir. | affirmed | |
| Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company v. United States | 205 (1921) | VanDevanter | none | none | Ct. Cl. | reversed |
| 208 (1921) | McReynolds | none | Pitney | 4th Cir. | affirmed | |
| 222 (1921) | Holmes | none | none | Nev. | affirmed | |
| St. Louis–San Francisco Railway Company v. Middlekamp | 226 (1921) | Holmes | none | none | W.D. Mo. | affirmed |
| Newberry v. United States | 232 (1921) | McReynolds | McKenna, Pitney | White | W.D. Mich. | reversed |
| New York v. New Jersey | 296 (1921) | Clarke | none | none | original | dismissed |
| St. Louis and East St. Louis Electric Railway Company v. Missouri ex rel. Hagerman | 314 (1921) | Clarke | none | none | Mo. | affirmed |
| 319 (1921) | McKenna | none | none | 8th Cir. | affirmed | |
| Philadelphia and Reading Railroad Company v. Di Donato | 327 (1921) | McKenna | none | none | Pa. | reversed |
| Philadelphia and Reading Railroad Company v. Polk | 332 (1921) | McKenna | none | none | Pa. | reversed |
| Brown v. United States | 335 (1921) | Holmes | none | none | 5th Cir. | reversed |
| 345 (1921) | Holmes | none | none | S.D.N.Y. | affirmed | |
| American Bank and Trust Company v. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta | 350 (1921) | Holmes | none | none | 5th Cir. | reversed |
| 359 (1921) | Day | none | none | D.C. Cir. | reversed | |
| 363 (1921) | Day | none | none | 2d Cir. | reversed | |
| Dillon v. Gloss | 368 (1921) | VanDevanter | none | none | N.D. Cal. | affirmed |
| 377 (1921) | Pitney | none | none | Ct. Cl. | affirmed | |
| 395 (1921) | Pitney | none | none | Pa. Super. Ct. | affirmed | |
| Yee Won v. White | 399 (1921) | McReynolds | none | none | 9th Cir. | affirmed |
| 402 (1921) | McReynolds | none | none | Ct. Cust. App. | affirmed | |
| New York Central Railroad Company v. York and Whitney Company | 406 (1921) | McReynolds | none | none | Mass. Super. Ct. | multiple |
| Vicksburg, Shreveport and Pacific Railway Company v. Anderson-Tully Company | 408 (1921) | Clarke | none | none | 5th Cir. | affirmed |
| Ex parte Matthew Addy Steamship and Commerce Corporation | 417 (1921) | Clarke | none | none | E.D. Va. | mandamus denied |
| 421 (1921) | McKenna | none | none | N.C. | reversed | |
| Michigan Central Railroad Company v. Mark Owen and Company | 427 (1921) | McKenna | none | McReynolds | Ill. | affirmed |
| Garland's Heirs v. Choctaw Nation | 439 (1921) | McKenna | none | none | Ct. Cl. | reversed |
| 446 (1921) | Holmes | none | none | S.D.N.Y. | reversed | |
| 450 (1921) | Day | none | none | D. Or. | affirmed | |
| 465 (1921) | Day | none | Brandeis | W.D. Pa. | reversed | |
| 477 (1921) | VanDevanter | none | none | Cal. | affirmed | |
| 483 (1921) | VanDevanter | none | none | Cal. | affirmed | |
| 484 (1921) | VanDevanter | none | none | 8th Cir. | reversed | |
| Ex parte New York I | 490 (1921) | Pitney | none | none | W.D.N.Y. | prohibition issued |
| Ex parte New York II | 503 (1921) | Pitney | none | none | W.D.N.Y. | prohibition issued |
| Ex parte Lincoln Gas and Electric Light Company | 512 (1921) | Pitney | none | none | D. Neb. | mandamus denied |
| 519 (1921) | Pitney | none | none | 8th Cir. | affirmed | |
| 524 (1921) | Pitney | none | none | W.D. Okla. | reversed | |
| 530 (1921) | Pitney | none | none | W.D. Okla. | reversed | |
| Choctaw, Oklahoma and Gulf Railroad Company v. Mackey | 531 (1921) | Brandeis | none | none | 8th Cir. | affirmed |
| Yazoo and Mississippi Valley Railroad Company v. Nichols Company | 540 (1921) | Brandeis | none | none | Miss. | affirmed |
| 547 (1921) | Brandeis | none | none | S.D.N.Y. | dismissed | |
| Missouri Pacific Railroad Company v. Ault | 554 (1921) | Brandeis | none | none | Ark. | reversed |
| Norfolk Southern Railroad Company v. Owens | 565 (1921) | Brandeis | none | none | N.C. | reversed |
| Western Union Telegraph Company v. Esteve Brothers and Company | 566 (1921) | Brandeis | none | none | 5th Cir. | reversed |
| 575 (1921) | Brandeis | none | none | Ct. Cl. | affirmed | |
| District of Columbia v. Andrews Paper Company | 582 (1921) | Clarke | none | none | D.C. Cir. | reversed |
| 589 (1921) | Clarke | none | none | Mass. | affirmed | |
| Oklahoma v. Texas | 602 (1921) | per curiam | none | none | original | continued |
| Missouri, Kansas and Texas Railway Company v. United States | 610 (1921) | Holmes | none | none | Ct. Cl. | affirmed |
| Ex parte Bey | 616 (1921) | VanDevanter | none | none | not indicated | mandamus denied |
| 619 (1921) | VanDevanter | none | none | 2d Cir. | affirmed | |
| 632 (1921) | VanDevanter | none | none | Ct. Cl. | affirmed | |
| Merchants' National Bank of Richmond v. City of Richmond | 635 (1921) | Pitney | none | none | Va. | reversed |
| Bowman v. Continental Oil Company | 642 (1921) | Pitney | none | none | D.N.M. | reversed |
| Harris v. District of Columbia | 650 (1921) | McReynolds | none | none | D.C. Cir. | certification |
| Seaboard Air Line Railroad Company v. United States | 655 (1921) | McReynolds | none | none | Ct. Cl. | reversed |
| 658 (1921) | McReynolds | none | none | Ark. | reversed | |
| Western Union Telegraph Company v. Poston | 662 (1921) | Brandeis | none | none | S.C. | reversed |
| 668 (1921) | Clarke | none | none | 3d Cir. | affirmed |
Notes and references
- "Supreme Court Research Guide". Georgetown Law Library. Retrieved April 7, 2021.
- Melz, Robert (1995). The Takings Issue: Constitutional Limits on Land-Use Control and Environmental Regulation. Island Press. p. 299. ISBN 978-1-55963-380-2.
- Renstrom, Peter G. (2003). The Taft Court: Justices, Rulings and Legacy. ABC-CLIO Ltd. p. 117. ISBN 978-1-57607-280-6.
External links
- [1] Case reports in volume 256 from Library of Congress
- [2] Case reports in volume 256 from Court Listener
- [3] Case reports in volume 256 from the Caselaw Access Project of Harvard Law School
- [4] Case reports in volume 256 from Google Scholar
- [5] Case reports in volume 256 from Justia
- [6] Case reports in volume 256 from Open Jurist
- Website of the United States Supreme Court
- United States Courts website about the Supreme Court
- National Archives, Records of the Supreme Court of the United States
- American Bar Association, How Does the Supreme Court Work?
- The Supreme Court Historical Society
Author: www.NiNa.Az
Publication date:
wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library, article, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games, mobile, phone, android, ios, apple, mobile phone, samsung, iphone, xiomi, xiaomi, redmi, honor, oppo, nokia, sonya, mi, pc, web, computer
This is a list of cases reported in volume 256 of United States Reports decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1921 Supreme Court of the United States38 53 26 N 77 00 16 W 38 89056 N 77 00444 W 38 89056 77 00444EstablishedMarch 4 1789 236 years ago 1789 03 04 LocationWashington D C Coordinates38 53 26 N 77 00 16 W 38 89056 N 77 00444 W 38 89056 77 00444Composition methodPresidential nomination with Senate confirmationAuthorised byConstitution of the United States Art III 1Judge term lengthlife tenure subject to impeachment and removalNumber of positions9 by statute Websitesupremecourt wbr govJustices of the Supreme Court at the time of volume 256 U S The Supreme Court is established by Article III Section 1 of the Constitution of the United States which says The judicial Power of the United States shall be vested in one supreme Court The size of the Court is not specified the Constitution leaves it to Congress to set the number of justices Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 Congress originally fixed the number of justices at six one chief justice and five associate justices Since 1789 Congress has varied the size of the Court from six to seven nine ten and back to nine justices always including one chief justice When the cases in volume 256 were decided the Court comprised the following nine members Portrait Justice Office Home State Succeeded Date confirmed by the Senate Vote Tenure on Supreme Court Edward Douglass White Chief Justice Louisiana Melville Fuller December 12 1910 Acclamation December 19 1910 May 19 1921 Died Joseph McKenna Associate Justice California Stephen Johnson Field January 21 1898 Acclamation January 26 1898 January 5 1925 Retired Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr Associate Justice Massachusetts Horace Gray December 4 1902 Acclamation December 8 1902 January 12 1932 Retired William R Day Associate Justice Ohio George Shiras Jr February 23 1903 Acclamation March 2 1903 November 13 1922 Retired Willis Van Devanter Associate Justice Wyoming Edward Douglass White as Associate Justice December 15 1910 Acclamation January 3 1911 June 2 1937 Retired Mahlon Pitney Associate Justice New Jersey John Marshall Harlan March 13 1912 50 26 March 18 1912 December 31 1922 Resigned James Clark McReynolds Associate Justice Tennessee Horace Harmon Lurton August 29 1914 44 6 October 12 1914 January 31 1941 Retired Louis Brandeis Associate Justice Massachusetts Joseph Rucker Lamar June 1 1916 47 22 June 5 1916 February 13 1939 Retired John Hessin Clarke Associate Justice Ohio Charles Evans Hughes July 24 1916 Acclamation October 9 1916 September 18 1922 Retired Notable Cases in volume 256 U S Block v Hirsh In Block v Hirsh 256 U S 135 1921 the Supreme Court upheld a temporary rent control law in the District of Columbia It set a precedent in American law that government can regulate housing conditions during times of emergency to maintain or improve living conditions In 1924 however the rental property statute upheld in the case reached the Court for a second review This time despite the language being the same the statute was struck down The Court held that the emergency necessitating the measure had passed and that that which justified interference with ordinarily existing property rights as of 1919 had come to an end by 1922 Newberry v United States Newberry v United States 256 U S 232 1921 is a decision by the Supreme Court which held that the United States Constitution did not grant the United States Congress the authority to regulate political party primaries or nomination processes The Court struck down 1911 amendments to the Federal Corrupt Practices Act which placed spending limits on candidate and political election committee spending in primaries or other nomination processes for federal office Brown v United States In Brown v United States 256 U S 335 1921 the Supreme Court held that if a person is attacked and that person reasonably believes that they are in immediate danger of death or grievous bodily injury then they have no duty to retreat and may stand their ground if they kill the attacker they have not exceeded the bounds of lawful self defense In writing the opinion Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes stated Detached reflection cannot be demanded in the presence of an uplifted knife Therefore in this Court at least it is not a condition of immunity that one in that situation should pause to consider whether a reasonable man might not think it possible to fly with safety or to disable his assailant rather than to kill him Dillon v Gloss Dillon v Gloss 256 U S 368 1921 is a case in which the Supreme Court held that Congress when proposing a constitutional amendment under the authority given to it by Article V of the Constitution may fix a definite period for its ratification and further that the reasonableness of the seven year period fixed by Congress in the resolution proposing the Eighteenth Amendment is beyond question Citation styleUnder the Judiciary Act of 1789 the federal court structure at the time comprised District Courts which had general trial jurisdiction Circuit Courts which had mixed trial and appellate from the US District Courts jurisdiction and the United States Supreme Court which had appellate jurisdiction over the federal District and Circuit courts and for certain issues over state courts The Supreme Court also had limited original jurisdiction i e in which cases could be filed directly with the Supreme Court without first having been heard by a lower federal or state court There were one or more federal District Courts and or Circuit Courts in each state territory or other geographical region The Judiciary Act of 1891 created the United States Courts of Appeals and reassigned the jurisdiction of most routine appeals from the district and circuit courts to these appellate courts The Act created nine new courts that were originally known as the United States Circuit Courts of Appeals The new courts had jurisdiction over most appeals of lower court decisions The Supreme Court could review either legal issues that a court of appeals certified or decisions of court of appeals by writ of certiorari On January 1 1912 the effective date of the Judicial Code of 1911 the old Circuit Courts were abolished with their remaining trial court jurisdiction transferred to the U S District Courts Bluebook citation style is used for case names citations and jurisdictions Cir United States Court of Appeals e g 3d Cir United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit D United States District Court for the District of e g D Mass United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts E Eastern M Middle N Northern S Southern W Western e g M D Ala United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama Ct Cl United States Court of Claims The abbreviation of a state s name alone indicates the highest appellate court in that state s judiciary at the time e g Pa Supreme Court of Pennsylvania e g Me Supreme Judicial Court of MaineList of cases in volume 256 U S Case Name Page and year Opinion of the Court Concurring opinion s Dissenting opinion s Lower Court Disposition 1 1921 McKenna none none 8th Cir affirmed 10 1921 McKenna none none 8th Cir affirmed United States v Smith 11 1921 McKenna none none Ct Cl affirmed 18 1921 Holmes none none 8th Cir reversed Arkansas v Mississippi 28 1921 per curiam none none original boundary set 35 1921 Day none none D C Cir dismissed 40 1921 Day none none D C Cir dismissed Minnesota ex rel Whipple v Martinson 41 1921 Day none none Minn affirmed 46 1921 Day none none 8th Cir reversed United States v Northern Pacific Railroad Company 51 1921 VanDevanter none none 9th Cir reversed Oklahoma v Texas 70 1921 Pitney none none original boundary set 94 1921 Pitney none White Del affirmed 113 1921 Pitney none none 7th Cir affirmed Wall v Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company 125 1921 McReynolds none none Ill dismissed Bank of Minden v Clement 126 1921 McReynolds none none La reversed 129 1921 McReynolds none none Cal dismissed Ex parte National Park Bank of New York 131 1921 Brandeis none none 5th Cir mandamus denied Missouri Pacific Railroad Company v McGrew Coal Company 134 1921 Brandeis none none Mo affirmed Block v Hirsh 135 1921 Holmes none McKenna D C Cir reversed 170 1921 Holmes none McKenna S D N Y affirmed 201 1921 VanDevanter none none 8th Cir affirmed Atchison Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company v United States 205 1921 VanDevanter none none Ct Cl reversed 208 1921 McReynolds none Pitney 4th Cir affirmed 222 1921 Holmes none none Nev affirmed St Louis San Francisco Railway Company v Middlekamp 226 1921 Holmes none none W D Mo affirmed Newberry v United States 232 1921 McReynolds McKenna Pitney White W D Mich reversed New York v New Jersey 296 1921 Clarke none none original dismissed St Louis and East St Louis Electric Railway Company v Missouri ex rel Hagerman 314 1921 Clarke none none Mo affirmed 319 1921 McKenna none none 8th Cir affirmed Philadelphia and Reading Railroad Company v Di Donato 327 1921 McKenna none none Pa reversed Philadelphia and Reading Railroad Company v Polk 332 1921 McKenna none none Pa reversed Brown v United States 335 1921 Holmes none none 5th Cir reversed 345 1921 Holmes none none S D N Y affirmed American Bank and Trust Company v Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta 350 1921 Holmes none none 5th Cir reversed 359 1921 Day none none D C Cir reversed 363 1921 Day none none 2d Cir reversed Dillon v Gloss 368 1921 VanDevanter none none N D Cal affirmed 377 1921 Pitney none none Ct Cl affirmed 395 1921 Pitney none none Pa Super Ct affirmed Yee Won v White 399 1921 McReynolds none none 9th Cir affirmed 402 1921 McReynolds none none Ct Cust App affirmed New York Central Railroad Company v York and Whitney Company 406 1921 McReynolds none none Mass Super Ct multiple Vicksburg Shreveport and Pacific Railway Company v Anderson Tully Company 408 1921 Clarke none none 5th Cir affirmed Ex parte Matthew Addy Steamship and Commerce Corporation 417 1921 Clarke none none E D Va mandamus denied 421 1921 McKenna none none N C reversed Michigan Central Railroad Company v Mark Owen and Company 427 1921 McKenna none McReynolds Ill affirmed Garland s Heirs v Choctaw Nation 439 1921 McKenna none none Ct Cl reversed 446 1921 Holmes none none S D N Y reversed 450 1921 Day none none D Or affirmed 465 1921 Day none Brandeis W D Pa reversed 477 1921 VanDevanter none none Cal affirmed 483 1921 VanDevanter none none Cal affirmed 484 1921 VanDevanter none none 8th Cir reversed Ex parte New York I 490 1921 Pitney none none W D N Y prohibition issued Ex parte New York II 503 1921 Pitney none none W D N Y prohibition issued Ex parte Lincoln Gas and Electric Light Company 512 1921 Pitney none none D Neb mandamus denied 519 1921 Pitney none none 8th Cir affirmed 524 1921 Pitney none none W D Okla reversed 530 1921 Pitney none none W D Okla reversed Choctaw Oklahoma and Gulf Railroad Company v Mackey 531 1921 Brandeis none none 8th Cir affirmed Yazoo and Mississippi Valley Railroad Company v Nichols Company 540 1921 Brandeis none none Miss affirmed 547 1921 Brandeis none none S D N Y dismissed Missouri Pacific Railroad Company v Ault 554 1921 Brandeis none none Ark reversed Norfolk Southern Railroad Company v Owens 565 1921 Brandeis none none N C reversed Western Union Telegraph Company v Esteve Brothers and Company 566 1921 Brandeis none none 5th Cir reversed 575 1921 Brandeis none none Ct Cl affirmed District of Columbia v Andrews Paper Company 582 1921 Clarke none none D C Cir reversed 589 1921 Clarke none none Mass affirmed Oklahoma v Texas 602 1921 per curiam none none original continued Missouri Kansas and Texas Railway Company v United States 610 1921 Holmes none none Ct Cl affirmed Ex parte Bey 616 1921 VanDevanter none none not indicated mandamus denied 619 1921 VanDevanter none none 2d Cir affirmed 632 1921 VanDevanter none none Ct Cl affirmed Merchants National Bank of Richmond v City of Richmond 635 1921 Pitney none none Va reversed Bowman v Continental Oil Company 642 1921 Pitney none none D N M reversed Harris v District of Columbia 650 1921 McReynolds none none D C Cir certification Seaboard Air Line Railroad Company v United States 655 1921 McReynolds none none Ct Cl reversed 658 1921 McReynolds none none Ark reversed Western Union Telegraph Company v Poston 662 1921 Brandeis none none S C reversed 668 1921 Clarke none none 3d Cir affirmedNotes and references Supreme Court Research Guide Georgetown Law Library Retrieved April 7 2021 Melz Robert 1995 The Takings Issue Constitutional Limits on Land Use Control and Environmental Regulation Island Press p 299 ISBN 978 1 55963 380 2 Renstrom Peter G 2003 The Taft Court Justices Rulings and Legacy ABC CLIO Ltd p 117 ISBN 978 1 57607 280 6 External links 1 Case reports in volume 256 from Library of Congress 2 Case reports in volume 256 from Court Listener 3 Case reports in volume 256 from the Caselaw Access Project of Harvard Law School 4 Case reports in volume 256 from Google Scholar 5 Case reports in volume 256 from Justia 6 Case reports in volume 256 from Open Jurist Website of the United States Supreme Court United States Courts website about the Supreme Court National Archives Records of the Supreme Court of the United States American Bar Association How Does the Supreme Court Work The Supreme Court Historical Society Portal Law